Garancia vagy túlzott óvatosság? - A szűk körű felülbírálat hivatalból kiterjesztése a felülvizsgálat során a büntetőeljárásban

In my study, I have examined whether there is a safeguard reason linked to the extension of the scope of the review by the office in the review procedure which serves as a justification for limiting the division of functions. In doing so, I first explored the conceptual framework that determines the...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerző: Kelemen Bálint
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: 2026
Sorozat:MAGYAR JOG 73 No. 1
Tárgyszavak:
doi:10.59851/mj.73.01.1

mtmt:36930268
Online Access:http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/39162
Leíró adatok
Tartalmi kivonat:In my study, I have examined whether there is a safeguard reason linked to the extension of the scope of the review by the office in the review procedure which serves as a justification for limiting the division of functions. In doing so, I first explored the conceptual framework that determines the scope of the review and whether the extension of the power of review plays a guaranteeing role. I then examined the case-law of the Curia on the grounds for ex officio review and attempted to answer the question whether, in addition to doctrine, case-law experience justifies a rule.
Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők:11
1-11
ISSN:0025-0147